Carmen
Travel editor at Reisedrop · 2026-10-02
For many travelers in the Randstad, Rotterdam The Hague Airport feels like the practical counterweight to Schiphol. The terminal is small, walking distances are short, and you can usually get from front door to gate faster. For a city break or a short beach trip, that can make a real difference in stress and total travel time. RTM is not an airport for everything, but it is a logical choice if you live near Rotterdam or The Hague and mainly fly within Europe. The advantage here is less about scale and more about simplicity.
Which routes make RTM especially useful
RTM works best on short leisure routes where speed and convenience matter most. The Transavia and TUI network focuses on destinations such as London, Barcelona, Malaga, Alicante, Faro, and parts of Morocco. These are routes where you may not need a huge choice of departure times, but you do want an easy start to your trip. For a weekend away or a week in the sun, that is appealing. You spend less time inside the airport itself and are often outside faster after landing than you would be at a larger hub.
When RTM makes more sense than AMS
RTM is usually more attractive than AMS when total journey time matters more than maximum choice. If you live in Rotterdam, The Hague, Delft, or nearby, getting to RTM can be clearly quicker than heading to Schiphol. Once there, the airport process is often faster too: check-in, security, and boarding are more manageable. That means a flight from RTM can feel more efficient in practice, even if AMS offers more options on paper. Especially for early departures or short trips, that simplicity can outweigh the broader network at Schiphol.
The trade-off of a small airport
The strengths of RTM come with clear limits. There are fewer frequencies, so you depend more on a smaller set of departure days and times. If a flight is full or disrupted, you have fewer easy alternatives than you would at AMS. RTM is also not built for long-haul travel: there are no intercontinental flights here. If you need flexibility, frequent business links, or onward connections to global networks, Schiphol will usually remain the better fit. RTM is strong because it is focused, but that same focus also defines its boundaries.
Parking and public transport: how to think about it
At RTM, parking is part of the appeal for many travelers. You stay close to the terminal and the whole process feels more compact than at a major airport. That makes RTM especially convenient if you travel with luggage, with children, or on a very early flight. Public transport can work well too, but the logic is different from AMS. There is no rail station under the terminal, so you usually combine train or metro with a bus or a short final transfer. From Rotterdam, that is manageable, though less seamless than Schiphol.
Who should choose RTM
RTM suits travelers who value speed, calm, and simplicity. Think couples planning a city break, families who want to avoid long airport processes, or anyone in the Rotterdam–The Hague region who would rather not route via AMS. If you live closer to Eindhoven, EIN may still make more sense for some holiday routes. And if you need many departure-time options, Schiphol will often win. So RTM is best seen not as a replacement for AMS, but as a smart niche airport for short European trips with as little hassle as possible.
See flights
Fancy exactly this? Zazou, our travel assistant, puts flights, hotels and a route together in seconds - and tells you honestly when it gets cheaper.
Plan this trip with Zazou